Talk:22edo
Can we keep discussion of scales to just one clearly-defined section? Currently the material on scales is scattered throughout the article, and the article often repeats itself about scales. --Hkm (talk) 23:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Mode names
The existing mode names for pentachordal were removed silently by HKM during a rework of the article. I disagree with this, and believe that it at the very least needs prior discussion and consensus agreement especially given a lot of us are fans of mode names. -- Vector (talk) 23:49, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- Can you explain your justification for adding those mode names? --Hkm (talk) 00:20, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
- Actually, I just noticed: Erlich already has some names for these modes. I find them a little more reasonable, but not all the modes are named. https://web.archive.org/web/20180927081411/http://lumma.org/tuning/erlich/erlich-decatonic.pdf
Chords and Scales
I don't really see a great reason to keep the "Chords" and "Scales" sections as separate subpages, honestly. The rationale for separating the Intervals section was more that it was a long list to scroll through on both the table of contents and the main page; I think this applies less to the other sections. What are some other thoughts? --Lériendil (talk) 04:29, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
