Comparisons of similar tunings
This page is intended to show the differences between multiple tunings that have a major purpose in common.
22, 27, 32, and 37edo
22 and 27edo are comparable because both are good representations of Superpyth temperament, but neither is obviously better. 37 is the obvious edo for Ultrapyth, which is tuned similarly to 22edo due to Porcupine.
22edo has 5/4, 9/7, and 11/8; neutral seconds (Porcupine). It also supports Pajara.
27edo has 6/5, 7/4, and 13/8
Both have 7/6
37edo has all 5.7.11.13 but the 3 is the sharpest so 7/6 and 9/7 are bad, the 81/80 is huge, but there are a bunch of unusual temperaments
32edo is halfway between 27 and 37 with its melodically strong blackdye, but begins to leave Superpyth mappings behind in favor of Ultrapyth. It is generally lacking in LCJI approximations due to being between temperaments, but is melodically promising, especially since it's unique in the group for having a middle neutral second.
37 and 57edo
37edo misses a relatively good approximation of prime 3 well but has accurate 5.7.11.13.(17).(19), whereas 57edo missed both 3 and 5 but has 7.11.13.17.19.23.29.37. For most purposes, 37edo has the advantage because it is significantly smaller and has a good 5, which simplifies the choices in how to approximate 4:5:6. Most composers don't have much use for primes above 13 anyway. However, its accurate primes are 2.5.7.11.13, whereas 57edo manages 2.7.11.13.17.19.23.29.37. 57edo also contains 19edo as a subset, which simplifies the somewhat difficult learning curve present in 37edo. Both tunings share the 2.7.11.13 Bossier temperament generated by a sharp 14/11.
81, 86, 100, and 117edo
These are some of the recommendations for dual-3 systems with contortion, which have promising ~2.3.5 blackdye and ~2.3.7 scales.
| Edo | Subset(s) | 2.<3.7 | 2.>3.5 | 2.>3.>5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81 | 27x3 | |||
| 86 | 43x2 | |||
| 100 | 25x4, 50x2 | |||
| 117 | 39x3 |
