Canonical extension

From Xenharmonic Reference
Revision as of 22:44, 4 February 2026 by Inthar (talk | contribs)
This is a technical or mathematical page. While the subject may be of some relevance to music, the page treats the subject in technical language.

Consider a regular temperament on a JI group.

  • A strong extension of said temperament on a larger JI group is canonical if it is the most efficient (accurate and low-complexity) strong extension of the temperament to the larger subgroup. This is a more informal concept which is decided by using heuristics and qualitative judgments.
  • Such an extension is (more strongly) structurally induced if the commas tempered out by the temperament induce the presence of the added prime(s). It has the following sub-concepts that can be defined formally:
    • Suppose the base temperament tempers out a comma that is a product of powers of consecutive square-superparticulars with nonzero exponents. A strong extension is endoparticular if it additionally tempers out the individual square-superparticulars.
    • Such an extension is paraparticular instead if it instead tempers out a square-superparticular adjacent to the square-superparticulars in question, or exoparticular instead if it instead tempers out a square-superparticular not adjacent to said square-superparticulars. Paraparticular and exoparticular extensions are generally not considered structurally induced.

Examples

This page or section is a work in progress. It may lack sufficient justification, content, or organization, and is subject to future overhaul.

Endoparticular extensions

5-limit Porcupine -> 2.3.5.11 Porcupine is endoparticular: we have

250243=(109)3/43=(109)(1110)2S(10)2/43=1091110121143S(10)2S(11)=S(10)2S(11),

and 2.3.5.11 Porcupine indeed tempers out S10 and S11.

Other examples:

  • 5-limit Kleismic -> 2.3.5.13 Kleismic
  • 5-limit Diaschismic -> 2.3.5.17 Diaschismic
  • 5-limit Würschmidt -> 2.3.5.23.47.49 Würschmidt

Paraparticular extensions

  • 2.3.5.13 Kleismic -> 2.3.5.7.13 Catakleismic

Canonical but non-structurally-induced extensions

  • 5-limit Meantone -> 7-limit Septimal Meantone (12 & 19)
  • 5-limit Tetracot -> 2.3.5.13 Tetracot

Conjectures

  • Conjecture: There is at most one S-expression for a comma in a given extended subgroup. As a corollary, an endoparticular extension of a temperament tempering out one given comma to a given extended subgroup is unique if it exists.
  • Stronger conjecture: An endoparticular extension for a given temperament of any rank and a given extended subgroup is unique if it exists (regardless of the choice of comma basis).