Tuning choice paralysis: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I'm also not advocating for using one tuning forever. No matter how many ternary scales I have or how large I multiply my main edo, other tunings have two massive advantages: simplicity and specific generator ranges. I suggest using a reasonably small edo or similar when you have a clear and specific concept for how a piece should be tuned. For example, I use 25edo for primarily antidiatonic pieces. It simplifies the interactions compared to the ternary equivalent in 37edo and requires fewer notes per octave at the expense of versatility, but in this case versatility is not necessary. My usage of 18edo takes advantage of how restrictive it is, forcing everything into oneirotonic and smitonic frameworks. | I'm also not advocating for using one tuning forever. No matter how many ternary scales I have or how large I multiply my main edo, other tunings have two massive advantages: simplicity and specific generator ranges. I suggest using a reasonably small edo or similar when you have a clear and specific concept for how a piece should be tuned. For example, I use 25edo for primarily antidiatonic pieces. It simplifies the interactions compared to the ternary equivalent in 37edo and requires fewer notes per octave at the expense of versatility, but in this case versatility is not necessary. My usage of 18edo takes advantage of how restrictive it is, forcing everything into oneirotonic and smitonic frameworks. | ||
The fundamental structure is what sets these apart from a large edo with the same options. 111edo may have a good tuning of Cohemimabila, but ignoring it is trivial. In 25edo, it's possibly the most important structure in the entire tuning. It doubles as Sixix and virtually every harmonic interpretation runs through it. If the intention when starting a piece is to use something generated by a supraminor third, that should be the focus. And if that's the focus, the choice is obvious. If there isn't a clear concept, the focus should be on what the main tuning is capable of. | |||
Revision as of 14:22, 29 October 2026
Tuning choice paralysis or just tuning paralysis is a term for the effects of having too many tuning systems and intervals available.
I was a 12edo composer with a similar style for years before getting into microtuning. I've noticed that my music has stagnated, while nearly all the progress I've made in the past several years is tuning-related.
The solution
For a composer with sufficient experience in microtuning, my solution is to have a main default tuning system. This is the one that you use as much like 12edo as possible, the one you keep coming back to, the one that feels like it can express anything. Mine is 37edo; it's complicated, but I could find a good ternary scale for just about anything once I knew how. Edo multiplication (74 and 111) adds just about anything I'm missing.
I'm also not advocating for using one tuning forever. No matter how many ternary scales I have or how large I multiply my main edo, other tunings have two massive advantages: simplicity and specific generator ranges. I suggest using a reasonably small edo or similar when you have a clear and specific concept for how a piece should be tuned. For example, I use 25edo for primarily antidiatonic pieces. It simplifies the interactions compared to the ternary equivalent in 37edo and requires fewer notes per octave at the expense of versatility, but in this case versatility is not necessary. My usage of 18edo takes advantage of how restrictive it is, forcing everything into oneirotonic and smitonic frameworks.
The fundamental structure is what sets these apart from a large edo with the same options. 111edo may have a good tuning of Cohemimabila, but ignoring it is trivial. In 25edo, it's possibly the most important structure in the entire tuning. It doubles as Sixix and virtually every harmonic interpretation runs through it. If the intention when starting a piece is to use something generated by a supraminor third, that should be the focus. And if that's the focus, the choice is obvious. If there isn't a clear concept, the focus should be on what the main tuning is capable of.
