Canonical extension: Difference between revisions
From Xenharmonic Reference
mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Examples == | == Examples == | ||
=== Natural extensions === | === Natural extensions === | ||
* 5-limit Kleismic -> L5.13 Kleismic | |||
* 5-limit Porcupine -> L5.11 Porcupine | |||
=== Canonical but non-natural extensions === | === Canonical but non-natural extensions === | ||
* L5[81/80] -> L7[81/80, 126/125] | |||
Revision as of 02:44, 4 February 2026
This page or section is a work in progress. It may lack sufficient justification, content, or organization, and is subject to future overhaul.
This is a technical or mathematical page. While the subject may be of some relevance to music, the page treats the subject in technical language.
(The page is marked as problematic because the definition of naturalness needs to be made more rigorous)
Let T be a regular temperament on JI group G and let H be a JI group containing G, but of one rank higher. The following are both informal concepts.
- A strong extension U on H is natural if the commas tempered out by T induce the presence of the added basis element of H.
- A strong extension U on H is (more weakly) canonical if it is the most efficient (accurate and low-complexity) strong extension of T to H.
Examples
Natural extensions
- 5-limit Kleismic -> L5.13 Kleismic
- 5-limit Porcupine -> L5.11 Porcupine
Canonical but non-natural extensions
- L5[81/80] -> L7[81/80, 126/125]
