Comparisons of similar tunings: Difference between revisions
From Xenharmonic Reference
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
22 and 27edo are comparable because both are good representations of Superpyth temperament, but neither is obviously better. 37 is the obvious edo for Ultrapyth, which is tuned similarly to 22edo due to Porcupine. | 22 and 27edo are comparable because both are good representations of Superpyth temperament, but neither is obviously better. 37 is the obvious edo for Ultrapyth, which is tuned similarly to 22edo due to Porcupine. | ||
22edo has 5/4, 9/7, and 11/8; neutral seconds (Porcupine) | 22edo has 5/4, 9/7, and 11/8; neutral seconds (Porcupine). It also supports Pajara. | ||
27edo has 6/5, 7/4, and 13/8 | 27edo has 6/5, 7/4, and 13/8 | ||
Both have 7/6 | Both have 7/6 | ||
37edo has all 5.7.11.13 but the 3 is the sharpest so 7/6 and 9/7 are bad, the 81/80 is huge, but there are a bunch of unusual temperaments | 37edo has all 5.7.11.13 but the 3 is the sharpest so 7/6 and 9/7 are bad, the 81/80 is huge, but there are a bunch of unusual temperaments | ||
Revision as of 02:33, 11 December 2025
This page is intended to show the differences between multiple tunings that have a major purpose in common.
22edo, 27edo, 37edo
22 and 27edo are comparable because both are good representations of Superpyth temperament, but neither is obviously better. 37 is the obvious edo for Ultrapyth, which is tuned similarly to 22edo due to Porcupine.
22edo has 5/4, 9/7, and 11/8; neutral seconds (Porcupine). It also supports Pajara.
27edo has 6/5, 7/4, and 13/8
Both have 7/6
37edo has all 5.7.11.13 but the 3 is the sharpest so 7/6 and 9/7 are bad, the 81/80 is huge, but there are a bunch of unusual temperaments
