Odd-limit: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
added words about distinction, monotonicity, etc. |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''Proper odd-limit''' is a stricter classification. The proper ''n''-odd-limit consists of all intervals in the ''n''-odd-limit that are in no lower odd-limits. | '''Proper odd-limit''' is a stricter classification. The proper ''n''-odd-limit consists of all intervals in the ''n''-odd-limit that are in no lower odd-limits. | ||
== Distinction and monotonicity == | |||
Distinguishing (having different representations of) intervals in a given odd-limit is an important way in which the resolution of a tuning system is specified. The smallest gap between two intervals of the ''n''-odd-limit is most commonly the ''n''th [[square superparticular]], S(''n'') = ''n''<sup>2</sup>/(''n''<sup>2</sup> - 1) (though certain odd-limits can have a gap of size (''n''<sup>2</sup> + 1)/''n''<sup>2</sup> instead: notably 7-odd, with [[50/49]] between [[7/5]] and [[10/7]]; or 21-odd, with [[442/441]] between [[21/17]] and [[26/21]]). Therefore, for a tuning system such as an [[EDO]] to distinguish the ''n''-odd-limit, it must be able to [[emancipate]] [[comma]]s the size of S(''n''): either by having a step size close to that size, or exaggerating intervals smaller than its step size. | |||
Another important property having to do with representations of odd-limits is '''monotonicity''': i.e. a tuning is monotonic in the ''n''-odd-limit if, for every two intervals within the odd-limit such that one is larger than the other, the tuning's representation of the larger interval is never smaller than its representation of the smaller interval. It is generally considered a minimal requirement, for intervals as tuned in a tuning to be registered as [[dyad]]s, for them to be tuned monotonically in relation to each other (though it would still be possible for an interval like [[10/9]] to exhibit its "structural" role as ([[4/3]])/([[6/5]]) even if it is tuned sharp of [[9/8]] or flat of [[11/10]], for example). Odd-limit monotonicity, in the context of [[equal-step tunings]], is also a necessary (but not sufficient) requirement for [[consistency]] in that odd-limit. If a tuning is monotonic in the ''n''-odd-limit and also distinguishes all intervals within that set, we can say it is '''strictly monotonic''' in the ''n''-odd-limit. | |||
== Individual odd-limits == | == Individual odd-limits == | ||
Revision as of 19:25, 20 May 2026
An odd-limit is a set of intervals defined by a maximum allowable number in the numerator or denominator once all factors of two are removed. It may be considered as a set of consonant intervals, generalizing the 12edo concept of consonance and dissonance. The 5-limit, for instance, includes 8/5, 6/5, and 3/2, but not 7/5 as that contains 7 (an odd number higher than 5); it does not contain 14/5 either because 14 reduces to 7.
Proper odd-limit is a stricter classification. The proper n-odd-limit consists of all intervals in the n-odd-limit that are in no lower odd-limits.
Distinction and monotonicity
Distinguishing (having different representations of) intervals in a given odd-limit is an important way in which the resolution of a tuning system is specified. The smallest gap between two intervals of the n-odd-limit is most commonly the nth square superparticular, S(n) = n2/(n2 - 1) (though certain odd-limits can have a gap of size (n2 + 1)/n2 instead: notably 7-odd, with 50/49 between 7/5 and 10/7; or 21-odd, with 442/441 between 21/17 and 26/21). Therefore, for a tuning system such as an EDO to distinguish the n-odd-limit, it must be able to emancipate commas the size of S(n): either by having a step size close to that size, or exaggerating intervals smaller than its step size.
Another important property having to do with representations of odd-limits is monotonicity: i.e. a tuning is monotonic in the n-odd-limit if, for every two intervals within the odd-limit such that one is larger than the other, the tuning's representation of the larger interval is never smaller than its representation of the smaller interval. It is generally considered a minimal requirement, for intervals as tuned in a tuning to be registered as dyads, for them to be tuned monotonically in relation to each other (though it would still be possible for an interval like 10/9 to exhibit its "structural" role as (4/3)/(6/5) even if it is tuned sharp of 9/8 or flat of 11/10, for example). Odd-limit monotonicity, in the context of equal-step tunings, is also a necessary (but not sufficient) requirement for consistency in that odd-limit. If a tuning is monotonic in the n-odd-limit and also distinguishes all intervals within that set, we can say it is strictly monotonic in the n-odd-limit.
Individual odd-limits
The 3-odd-limit contains the perfect consonances - the unison, fourth, fifth, and octave. (Though note that the fourth may be considered a dissonance in some functional contexts, leading down to the major third.)
The 5-odd-limit expands the range to include imperfect consonances, which are intervals that alongside 1, 2, 3, and 4, may also have numerators and denominators of 5, 6, and 8. These are 5/4, 6/5, 8/5, and 5/3 - the 5-limit major and minor thirds and sixths, approximated in 12edo. The diatonic intervals corresponding to these categories were considered dissonances historically, due to using the complex Pythagorean tunings instead of meantone-related ones.
The 7- and 9-odd limit contain more "exotic" septimal consonances (including a tritone, 7/5); expanding to the 9-odd-limit also implies considering 10/9 and 9/8 consonant. These may be considered "secondary" consonances.
More info is on each individual odd-limit page.
