User:Aura/On 159edo Music Theory (Part 2): Difference between revisions
From Xenharmonic Reference
Creating page. I'll have to expand on the content of this page soon... |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''It is recommended that one read [[User:Aura/On 159edo Music Theory (Part 1)|Part 1]] prior to reading this article'' | ''It is recommended that one read [[User:Aura/On 159edo Music Theory (Part 1)|Part 1]] prior to reading this article'' | ||
Now that we have covered the intervals of [[159edo]] as well as the possible trines, it's time we begin looking at possible triads. | Now that we have covered the intervals of [[159edo]] as well as the possible trines, it's time we begin looking at possible triads. To lay a few ground rules, the most consonant triads tend not only to involve the closest approximations of consonant just intervals, but the trine that forms their backbone is also consonant in as of itself. One should note that even in the best-case scenarios, fourth-bounded triads will be ambisonant, as there is not much room for full-fledged consonance in triads like these. | ||
Revision as of 06:52, 31 March 2026
It is recommended that one read Part 1 prior to reading this article
Now that we have covered the intervals of 159edo as well as the possible trines, it's time we begin looking at possible triads. To lay a few ground rules, the most consonant triads tend not only to involve the closest approximations of consonant just intervals, but the trine that forms their backbone is also consonant in as of itself. One should note that even in the best-case scenarios, fourth-bounded triads will be ambisonant, as there is not much room for full-fledged consonance in triads like these.
