Talk:22edo: Difference between revisions
From Xenharmonic Reference
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Can we keep discussion of scales to just one clearly-defined section? Currently the material on scales is scattered throughout the article, and the article often repeats itself about scales. --[[User:Hkm|Hkm]] ([[User talk:Hkm|talk]]) 23:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC) | Can we keep discussion of scales to just one clearly-defined section? Currently the material on scales is scattered throughout the article, and the article often repeats itself about scales. --[[User:Hkm|Hkm]] ([[User talk:Hkm|talk]]) 23:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC) | ||
: Unified the material into one "Scales" section. [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 01:12, 8 January 2026 (UTC) | : Unified the material into one "Scales" section. [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 01:12, 8 January 2026 (UTC) | ||
== Mode names == | |||
The existing mode names for pentachordal were removed silently by HKM during a rework of the article. I disagree with this, and believe that it at the very least needs prior discussion and consensus agreement especially given a lot of us are fans of mode names. -- [[User:Vector|Vector]] ([[User talk:Vector|talk]]) 23:49, 8 January 2026 (UTC) | |||
: Can you explain your justification for adding those mode names? --[[User:Hkm|Hkm]] ([[User talk:Hkm|talk]]) 00:20, 9 January 2026 (UTC) | |||
: Actually, I just noticed: Erlich already has some names for these modes. I find them a little more reasonable, but not all the modes are named. https://web.archive.org/web/20180927081411/http://lumma.org/tuning/erlich/erlich-decatonic.pdf | |||
:: I added Erlich's names where they exist. -- [[User:Vector|Vector]] ([[User talk:Vector|talk]]) 00:38, 9 January 2026 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:38, 9 January 2026
Can we keep discussion of scales to just one clearly-defined section? Currently the material on scales is scattered throughout the article, and the article often repeats itself about scales. --Hkm (talk) 23:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
Mode names
The existing mode names for pentachordal were removed silently by HKM during a rework of the article. I disagree with this, and believe that it at the very least needs prior discussion and consensus agreement especially given a lot of us are fans of mode names. -- Vector (talk) 23:49, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- Can you explain your justification for adding those mode names? --Hkm (talk) 00:20, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
- Actually, I just noticed: Erlich already has some names for these modes. I find them a little more reasonable, but not all the modes are named. https://web.archive.org/web/20180927081411/http://lumma.org/tuning/erlich/erlich-decatonic.pdf
