User talk:Kaiveran: Difference between revisions
From Xenharmonic Reference
Tags: Rollback Reverted |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
-- [[User:Vector|Vector]] ([[User talk:Vector|talk]]) 18:11, 18 May 2026 (UTC) | -- [[User:Vector|Vector]] ([[User talk:Vector|talk]]) 18:11, 18 May 2026 (UTC) | ||
: Apologies. I was not sober and somehow the use of the humble text editor to urgently save a ''text'' file didn't occur to me. Is "no Scala files" a blanket policy? If so, I wouldn't even include it as a 31EDO subpage, as the most recent edit has done, and just nominate it for deletion. I plan to work on a page discussing this and other partial skip-fretting schemes in detail (where these scala files are used to physically model the fretting scheme, hence the previously included link.) [[User:Kaiveran|Kaiveran]] ([[User talk:Kaiveran|talk]]) 06:48, 22 May 2026 (UTC) | |||
:: On my part, I'd say that if you're using a Scala file as part of a larger article you're assembling, it's best practice to put it in a user page sandbox. I'm reluctant to make blanket policies for basically anything though; though "entire pages just for single scales with no theory info" is going to be discouraged as we don't want to proliferate anything that's pure documentation without additional substance to it. Ideally, Scala files as part of pages that list different scales and have some explanation attached to them would be best practice; though in the modern day SW2 or SW3 links might be preferable anyhow. --[[User:Lériendil|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil|talk]]) 14:44, 22 May 2026 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 14:44, 22 May 2026
Do not add scala files
Do not add scala files to XenReference. (Also, do not add entire pages just for single scales with no theory info.) (Also also, title pages in a readable manner.)
-- Vector (talk) 18:11, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
- Apologies. I was not sober and somehow the use of the humble text editor to urgently save a text file didn't occur to me. Is "no Scala files" a blanket policy? If so, I wouldn't even include it as a 31EDO subpage, as the most recent edit has done, and just nominate it for deletion. I plan to work on a page discussing this and other partial skip-fretting schemes in detail (where these scala files are used to physically model the fretting scheme, hence the previously included link.) Kaiveran (talk) 06:48, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
- On my part, I'd say that if you're using a Scala file as part of a larger article you're assembling, it's best practice to put it in a user page sandbox. I'm reluctant to make blanket policies for basically anything though; though "entire pages just for single scales with no theory info" is going to be discouraged as we don't want to proliferate anything that's pure documentation without additional substance to it. Ideally, Scala files as part of pages that list different scales and have some explanation attached to them would be best practice; though in the modern day SW2 or SW3 links might be preferable anyhow. --Lériendil (talk) 14:44, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
