User:Inthar: Difference between revisions
From XenReference
No edit summary |
|||
| (14 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Inthar''' (''in-THAR'', th as in "thin") is a wiki | '''Inthar''' (''in-THAR'', th as in "thin") is a wiki editor. He's primarily a theorist, not a composer. | ||
Most of his pieces can be found on the [https://en.xen.wiki/w/User:Inthar Xen Wiki]. | Most of his pieces can be found on the [https://en.xen.wiki/w/User:Inthar Xen Wiki]. | ||
== Todo == | |||
* Try to prove uniqueness of endoparticular extensions | |||
== I Am the Very Model of a Modern Xenharmonicist (parody) == | |||
Todo: 16edo cover | |||
<pre> | |||
I am the very model of a modern xenharmonicist. | |||
With sundry regularly-tempered lattices I can assist. | |||
I’ve mastered all of vicesimononal primodality. | |||
I can group edos by their temperamental commonalities. | |||
I can hum every pitch in my beloved triple Bohlen-Pierce, | |||
And I debate harmonic entropy with graphs and trolling fierce. | |||
I know the 90edo chords near-just and delta-rational, | |||
My xen math papers shine in conferences international. | |||
I know all epimoric 47-limit ratios, | |||
I can confirm all zeta edo notions ab initio. | |||
In short, in matters theory and praxis I need not insist: | |||
I am the very model of a modern xenharmonicist. | |||
I make primodal chord-scales for establishing tonality. | |||
I know the perfect edo for evoking liminality. | |||
The optimality of penslen out of all scales ternary | |||
Is plain — it also beats most every scale that's merely binary. | |||
My dalliance with MOSses only strengthens this conviction mine. | |||
I learn an edo's prime approximations to two-sixty-nine. | |||
The wonders of concordance shells I savor in my room alone. | |||
I play Vavoom and Whoosh and Gross and Pirate on my Lumatone. | |||
The derivation of all SV4’s I find perspicuous; | |||
That said, my preferences are for scales with buzz conspicuous. | |||
In short, in matters theory and praxis I need not insist: | |||
I am the very model of a modern xenharmonicist. | |||
</pre> | |||
{{subpages}} | |||
Latest revision as of 14:03, 11 February 2026
Inthar (in-THAR, th as in "thin") is a wiki editor. He's primarily a theorist, not a composer.
Most of his pieces can be found on the Xen Wiki.
Todo
- Try to prove uniqueness of endoparticular extensions
I Am the Very Model of a Modern Xenharmonicist (parody)
Todo: 16edo cover
I am the very model of a modern xenharmonicist. With sundry regularly-tempered lattices I can assist. I’ve mastered all of vicesimononal primodality. I can group edos by their temperamental commonalities. I can hum every pitch in my beloved triple Bohlen-Pierce, And I debate harmonic entropy with graphs and trolling fierce. I know the 90edo chords near-just and delta-rational, My xen math papers shine in conferences international. I know all epimoric 47-limit ratios, I can confirm all zeta edo notions ab initio. In short, in matters theory and praxis I need not insist: I am the very model of a modern xenharmonicist. I make primodal chord-scales for establishing tonality. I know the perfect edo for evoking liminality. The optimality of penslen out of all scales ternary Is plain — it also beats most every scale that's merely binary. My dalliance with MOSses only strengthens this conviction mine. I learn an edo's prime approximations to two-sixty-nine. The wonders of concordance shells I savor in my room alone. I play Vavoom and Whoosh and Gross and Pirate on my Lumatone. The derivation of all SV4’s I find perspicuous; That said, my preferences are for scales with buzz conspicuous. In short, in matters theory and praxis I need not insist: I am the very model of a modern xenharmonicist.
