Talk:22edo - Revision history

Vector at 05:03, 17 May 2026

2026-05-17T05:03:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:03, 17 May 2026
Line 14:		Line 14:

	I don't really see a great reason to keep the "Chords" and "Scales" sections as separate subpages, honestly. The rationale for separating the Intervals section was more that it was a long list to scroll through on both the table of contents and the main page; I think this applies less to the other sections. What are some other thoughts? --[[User:Lériendil\|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil\|talk]]) 04:29, 17 May 2026 (UTC)		I don't really see a great reason to keep the "Chords" and "Scales" sections as separate subpages, honestly. The rationale for separating the Intervals section was more that it was a long list to scroll through on both the table of contents and the main page; I think this applies less to the other sections. What are some other thoughts? --[[User:Lériendil\|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil\|talk]]) 04:29, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
			: They're kinda just big lists of tables lol. I'll add them back if other people are in support. [[User:Vector\|Vector]] ([[User talk:Vector\|talk]]) 05:03, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Lériendil: /* Chords and Scales */ new section

2026-05-17T04:29:27Z

Chords and Scales: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:29, 17 May 2026
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:: I added Erlich's names where they exist. -- [[User:Vector\|Vector]] ([[User talk:Vector\|talk]]) 00:38, 9 January 2026 (UTC)		:: I added Erlich's names where they exist. -- [[User:Vector\|Vector]] ([[User talk:Vector\|talk]]) 00:38, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

			== Chords and Scales ==

			I don't really see a great reason to keep the "Chords" and "Scales" sections as separate subpages, honestly. The rationale for separating the Intervals section was more that it was a long list to scroll through on both the table of contents and the main page; I think this applies less to the other sections. What are some other thoughts? --[[User:Lériendil\|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil\|talk]]) 04:29, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Vector at 00:38, 9 January 2026

2026-01-09T00:38:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:38, 9 January 2026
Line 8:		Line 8:
	: Can you explain your justification for adding those mode names? --[[User:Hkm\|Hkm]] ([[User talk:Hkm\|talk]]) 00:20, 9 January 2026 (UTC)		: Can you explain your justification for adding those mode names? --[[User:Hkm\|Hkm]] ([[User talk:Hkm\|talk]]) 00:20, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
	: Actually, I just noticed: Erlich already has some names for these modes. I find them a little more reasonable, but not all the modes are named. https://web.archive.org/web/20180927081411/http://lumma.org/tuning/erlich/erlich-decatonic.pdf		: Actually, I just noticed: Erlich already has some names for these modes. I find them a little more reasonable, but not all the modes are named. https://web.archive.org/web/20180927081411/http://lumma.org/tuning/erlich/erlich-decatonic.pdf

			:: I added Erlich's names where they exist. -- [[User:Vector\|Vector]] ([[User talk:Vector\|talk]]) 00:38, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Hkm at 00:32, 9 January 2026

2026-01-09T00:32:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:32, 9 January 2026
Line 7:		Line 7:

	: Can you explain your justification for adding those mode names? --[[User:Hkm\|Hkm]] ([[User talk:Hkm\|talk]]) 00:20, 9 January 2026 (UTC)		: Can you explain your justification for adding those mode names? --[[User:Hkm\|Hkm]] ([[User talk:Hkm\|talk]]) 00:20, 9 January 2026 (UTC)
			: Actually, I just noticed: Erlich already has some names for these modes. I find them a little more reasonable, but not all the modes are named. https://web.archive.org/web/20180927081411/http://lumma.org/tuning/erlich/erlich-decatonic.pdf

Hkm at 00:20, 9 January 2026

2026-01-09T00:20:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:20, 9 January 2026
Line 5:		Line 5:

	The existing mode names for pentachordal were removed silently by HKM during a rework of the article. I disagree with this, and believe that it at the very least needs prior discussion and consensus agreement especially given a lot of us are fans of mode names. -- [[User:Vector\|Vector]] ([[User talk:Vector\|talk]]) 23:49, 8 January 2026 (UTC)		The existing mode names for pentachordal were removed silently by HKM during a rework of the article. I disagree with this, and believe that it at the very least needs prior discussion and consensus agreement especially given a lot of us are fans of mode names. -- [[User:Vector\|Vector]] ([[User talk:Vector\|talk]]) 23:49, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

			: Can you explain your justification for adding those mode names? --[[User:Hkm\|Hkm]] ([[User talk:Hkm\|talk]]) 00:20, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Vector: /* Mode names */ new section

2026-01-08T23:49:10Z

Mode names: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:49, 8 January 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Can we keep discussion of scales to just one clearly-defined section? Currently the material on scales is scattered throughout the article, and the article often repeats itself about scales. --[[User:Hkm\|Hkm]] ([[User talk:Hkm\|talk]]) 23:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC)		Can we keep discussion of scales to just one clearly-defined section? Currently the material on scales is scattered throughout the article, and the article often repeats itself about scales. --[[User:Hkm\|Hkm]] ([[User talk:Hkm\|talk]]) 23:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
	: Unified the material into one "Scales" section. [[User:Inthar\|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar\|talk]]) 01:12, 8 January 2026 (UTC)		: Unified the material into one "Scales" section. [[User:Inthar\|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar\|talk]]) 01:12, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

			== Mode names ==

			The existing mode names for pentachordal were removed silently by HKM during a rework of the article. I disagree with this, and believe that it at the very least needs prior discussion and consensus agreement especially given a lot of us are fans of mode names. -- [[User:Vector\|Vector]] ([[User talk:Vector\|talk]]) 23:49, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Inthar at 01:12, 8 January 2026

2026-01-08T01:12:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:12, 8 January 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Can we keep discussion of scales to just one clearly-defined section? Currently the material on scales is scattered throughout the article, and the article often repeats itself about scales. --[[User:Hkm\|Hkm]] ([[User talk:Hkm\|talk]]) 23:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC)		Can we keep discussion of scales to just one clearly-defined section? Currently the material on scales is scattered throughout the article, and the article often repeats itself about scales. --[[User:Hkm\|Hkm]] ([[User talk:Hkm\|talk]]) 23:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
			: Unified the material into one "Scales" section. [[User:Inthar\|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar\|talk]]) 01:12, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Hkm at 23:00, 7 January 2026

2026-01-07T23:00:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:00, 7 January 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Can we keep discussion of scales to just one clearly-defined section? Currently the material on scales is scattered throughout the article, and the article often repeats itself about scales.		Can we keep discussion of scales to just one clearly-defined section? Currently the material on scales is scattered throughout the article, and the article often repeats itself about scales. --[[User:Hkm\|Hkm]] ([[User talk:Hkm\|talk]]) 23:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

Hkm: Created page with "Can we keep discussion of scales to just one clearly-defined section? Currently the material on scales is scattered throughout the article, and the article often repeats itself about scales."

2026-01-07T23:00:18Z

Created page with "Can we keep discussion of scales to just one clearly-defined section? Currently the material on scales is scattered throughout the article, and the article often repeats itself about scales."

New page

Can we keep discussion of scales to just one clearly-defined section? Currently the material on scales is scattered throughout the article, and the article often repeats itself about scales.